Seeing as how the Senators are in the midst of a 4-day layoff and have now dropped four of their past five, perhaps it's a good time to be asking this question.
Now, I have no problem with signing "character guys" to contracts. We all know it was heartwarming and shit like that to see Matt Carkner sign a major league deal after toiling away in the minors, and what heartless son of a bitch wouldn't feel at least a tinge of happiness at Five for Smiting's report that Peter Regin is being told to buy a house in the city?
There were also reports last week that the GM's office is in talks with Anton Volchenkov to sign him to a long-term extension as well.
These are all good players. But I really don't get the strategy here.
Murray has surprised many in past years by giving big long-term deals to role players like Mike Fisher and Chris Kelly because, gonsarnit, they've just worked so goshdarn hard over the years that they clearly deserved it.
The only problem is that these big long-term deals are eating up a lot of the flexibility that a GM needs under the modern salary cap system. Think of the Ottawa Senators like a donut. Murray started putting it together from the outside, but by the time he got to the middle there was nothing left.
Another problem with this approach is that it's really inflexible. Players get injured or have really fucking godawful seasons (exhibit a: Fisher and Kelly in 2008/2009). Because they're locked in for long-term deals, the team can't do anything about it.
The thing with role guys like these is that they're expendable. There's always more of them coming up through the Binghamton pipline or available through free agency.
Pretty soon, the Senators are going to caught in the purgatory of the hockey world. Constant mediocrity. Instead of taking the time to rebuild and retool around a set of core guys (Fisher and Kelly are not core guys), this team will be permanently hovering around the .500 mark, sometime sneaking into the playoffs but never really competing.
In an era where players reach free agency at a younger age than ever before, wouldn't it make sense to build your core guys and then add the Mike Fishers, Chris Kellys, and Anton Volchenkovs when you actually have a chance to win?
Just a thought as we wait to see what November has in store for a team that is sliding closer and closer to .500 hockey.